My One Major Problem With the “Noah” Movie

by Andrew Forrest



I loved the first 2 hours of Darren Aronofsky’s?Noah. I have no problem with the creative liberties Mr. Aronofsky takes with the source material–in fact I loved his creativity. Below, I’ll tell you what I appreciated. But first….

Here’s My Problem With?Noah?(no spoilers here):

In a masterful way, the film’s message couldn’t be more?clear, true, or terrifying: humans are a violent, selfish, sinful race, and there is no hope for us. We cannot save ourselves.

And then the final 18 minutes makes this point: “After the Flood, the good news is that humanity–led by Noah–now gets to save itself.”

See the problem?

  • Minutes 0-120: humanity is a mess and cannot save itself.
  • Minutes 121-138: humanity will now save itself.

Even artistically, the ending doesn’t fit with the rest of the movie.

In a very sad way, Darren Aronofsky’s conclusion undermines what he has been trying to tell us and proves how deeply our delusion goes. “We are a mess and we will never be able to save ourselves….Unless we try really hard and save ourselves.” This is the extent of our wisdom.

The Great War began 100 years ago this summer. The best and the brightest of European culture and society were convinced that such a war was impossible, because humankind was now enlightened and rational. And then came the Somme.

The last 100 years ought to have caused Mr. Aronofsky to be more cautious in his movie’s conclusion, but the sad story of humanity is that we never learn.

As I mentioned, I have no problem whatsoever with the major creative liberties Mr. Aronofsky took with the Genesis material. But, I do have a major theological problem with Mr. Aronofsky’s ultimate conclusion. The Genesis account couldn’t be clearer: humanity is just as messed up after the Flood as before.

If the last 18 minutes were different (and it wouldn’t have required much to change the final message),?Aronofky’s?Noah would have been a great movie. As it is, I think it’s one more example of humanity’s problem.


Here’s What I Loved About the Movie (Spoiler Warning):

  • Noah’s retelling of Genesis 1 to his family. The visuals that go along with his retelling are beautiful, interpreting the deep theology and poetry of the Creation account in ways I’ve never seen before.
  • “The Watchers.” The Watchers are fallen angels, and though I was initially skeptical when they appeared on the screen, I quickly appreciated their part in the story. The Watchers are fallen angels not because they rebelled against God by wanting to take his place, but because they rebelled against God by wanting to help humanity too much. There is a lot of wisdom in that understanding of sin. Their curse is to become part of the earth, and so they appear as rock giants.
  • Noah’s self-understanding. Noah sees himself as totally flawed and unrighteous and believes his only role is to steward creation, and then die.
  • Noah’s family dynamic. I think the tension that Noah’s devotion–obsession?–causes in his family rang true.
  • The Flood itself. Terrifying and utterly believable.
  • All the small, human details. The scene where Noah’s family is in the Ark and hears the screams of those bereft outside? Wow.
  • Actually, I loved pretty much everything about the first 120 minutes of the movie….


UPDATE:?Over at?First Things, Wesley Hill has the same problem with?Noah that I do, but says it better.

You May Also Like


Paul Ditto April 4, 2014 - 8:18 am

Now I cannot wait to see Noah. The end does not surprise me. Most movies are meant to tap into our fantasies, make us feel good, be uplifted or proud or self-righteous, etc. The truth would have been more than most could handle or understand. Most would not have seen how uplifting they truth was, so, instead, give the masses what they want and sell more movies.

Andrew Forrest April 4, 2014 - 9:53 am

Paul, you are probably right, but with a few small tweaks, the movie could have been great. Instead, it’s just more the same, and it doesn’t help us see the extent of our problem.

Canitha Graning April 5, 2014 - 11:09 am

I have not seen it yet, but I have read several commentaries. What I love about movies like these is it gets people talking! Most people think they know the story of Noah and Jonah and many others, but, in reality, they don’t. Years ago when I went to see Passion of the Christ, I was at a crossroads spiritually. I got so mad at the scene where Satan came into the garden of Gethsemene and talked to Jesus because I could not remember that from the story. The Bible says an angel came and ministered to Jesus in the garden. After some research, I read that Mel Gibson has used other sources as well as the Bible, some writings by Christian Mystics. This even made me madder! Hahaha. So, I had gone to the movie so I could argue my points against Christianity and came out digging in my Bible to fine inaccuracies in the film!!! This began my return to the church! So, God in His infinite wisdom can use any and all things to make His point! Love your review!!!! <3

Andrew Forrest April 5, 2014 - 4:13 pm

Canitha, that’s a great testimony to the many strange ways the Lord works to bring us to him. You never know.

Quick Thoughts on Genesis 1 (& the Best Visual Interpretation I've Seen) - Andrew Forrest January 5, 2015 - 4:47 am

[…] I’ve written previously about Darren Aronofsky’s?Noah?and shared some of my reservations about the final 15 disappointing minutes of the movie. ?But this scene in which Noah retells the Genesis story of Creation and Fall is the best visual interpretation of scripture I’ve ever seen (although the image from The Minimum Bible project I included above is pretty good, too): […]


Leave a Comment